![intel pentium gold g5500 intel pentium gold g5500](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SlhUP5RaslA/maxresdefault.jpg)
The one thing that is driving me crazy is the uneven heigh… ganeshts: I bought the same one (it is 1600p, not 1440p).You can keep adding layers, but can you do so at ever-decreasing costs? RyanSmithAT: I'm more curious what the economics look like.But I have a *really* hard time believing Dell and AMI's story here. RyanSmithAT: This is a very interesting story.IanCutress: Better thermal dissipation properties of bulk silicon, according to Qua….IanCutress: One of the key Centaur engineers has changed his Linkedin to Intel.IanCutress: It's most relevant for mobile chips where z-height is a commodity.IanCutress: Word 2003 is so old it doesn't have the word 'smartphone' in its base directory.It all barely makes little sense but there we are. There's also perhaps a bit of market expectation: if you say it's an 18W processor, people might not take it seriously. Then there's the argument that some chips, the ones that barely make the grade, might actually hit that power value at load, so they have to cover all scenarios. Riding close to the actual power consumption might give motherboard vendors more reasons to cheap out on power delivery on the cheapest products too. Firstly, vendors will argue that TDP is a measure of cooling capacity, not power (technically true), and so getting a 35W or 54W cooler is overkill for these chips, helping keep them cool and viable for longer (as they might already be rejected silicon). Scale the frequency back, as well as the voltage, and remember that it's a non-linear relationship, and it's quite clear to see where the 18W peak power of the 200GE comes from.
![intel pentium gold g5500 intel pentium gold g5500](https://img.productz.com/1718132/intel-pentium-gold-g5500-14-preview.jpeg)
That's at high frequency (4.3 GHz) and all cores, so if we cut that down to two cores at the same frequency, we get 29W, which is already under the 200GE TDP. AMD's big chips have eight cores with hyperthreading have a box number of 105W and a tested result of 117W. Truth be told, we can look at this analytically. So when I said those numbers were misleading and irrelevant, this is what I mean. Both CPUs have power consumption numbers well below the rated number on the box - AMD at about half, and Intel below half.
![intel pentium gold g5500 intel pentium gold g5500](https://ru.gecid.com/data/cpu/201809250800-53634/img/10_intel_penitum_gold_g5500.png)
#Intel pentium gold g5500 full
TDP relates to the full CPU package, so here's what we see with a full load on both chips: Both Intel and AMD have been fairly good in recent memory in keeping these registers open, showing package, core, and other power values. There's no real way to tell which one you have without taking the heatspreader off and seeing how big the silicon is.įor our power tests, we probe the internal power registers during a heavy load (in this case, POV-Ray), and see what numbers spit out. The Pentium G5400 situation is a bit more complex, as it offers two values: 54W or 58W, depending on if the processor has come from a dual-core design (54W) or a cut down quad-core design (58W). On the official specification lists, the Athlon 200GE is rated at 35W - all of AMD's GE processors are rated at this value. Well, I'm here to tell you that the TDP numbers for the G5400 and 200GE are similarly misleading and irrelevant, but in the opposite direction. Users without appropriate cooling could hit thermal saving performance states very quickly. These parts, labeled 95W, can go beyond 160W easily, and motherboard manufacturers don't adhere to Intel official specifications on turbo time. In that piece, I wrote that the single number is often both misleading and irrelevant, especially for the new Core i9 parts sitting at the top of Intel's offerings. This means it will become a bottleneck in some demanding applications, although gaming performance will be largely fine.Regular readers may have come across a recent article I wrote about the state of power consumption and the magic 'TDP' numbers that Intel writes on the side of its processors. Intel's Pentium Gold G5500 3.8GHz offers average to good performance and is classified in the low to middle-class range of processors. It will struggle to run the latest AAA games at playable frame rates.īoth the processor and integrated graphics have a rated board TDP of 51W. The processor integrates Graphics called Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Kaby Lake), with 24 Execution Units, initially clocked at 350MHz and that go up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode which shares the L2 Cache and system RAM with the processor. It offers 2 Physical Cores (4 Logical), clocked at 3.8GHz and 4MB of 元 Cache.Īmong its many features, Hyperthreading, Virtualization, and Enhanced SpeedStep are activated. The Pentium Gold G5500 2-Core 3.8GHz is a budget processor based on the 14nm Cofee Lake architecture. Pentium Gold G5500 2-Core 3.8GHz Game Requirement Analysis